Heat transfer of phase change materials (PCMs) and thermochemical heat storage in porous materials

logo

Journals Books
Advanced Search
Sign in Register

中文

Chinese Science Bulletin
Download PDF
Chinese Science Bulletin, Volume 61, Issue 17: 1897-1911(2016) https://doi.org/10.1360/N972015-00424

Heat transfer of phase change materials (PCMs) and thermochemical heat storage in porous materials

ChangYing ZHAO, ZhiHao PAN, Qian WANG, ZhiGuo XU
More info
  • ReceivedApr 20, 2015
  • AcceptedMay 13, 2015
  • PublishedJun 20, 2015
Previous Table of Contents Next
Share
Rating

Abstract

Thermal energy storage plays an important role in energy conservation and reducing CO2 emissions. Thermal energy storage involves sensible heat storage, latent heat storage and thermochemical heat storage. Compared with sensible heat storage, latent heat storage and thermochemical heat storage benefits of their high energy storage densities, which helps to reduce the initial cost of the construction of heat storage systems. However, the thermal conductivities of the phase change and thermochemical reaction materials are usually lower than 1 W m-1 K-1, which impedes the development and further applications of the corresponding energy storage systems. Porous materials, e.g. metal foams and expanded graphite, combining with other materials to form composites is an effective method for heat transfer enhancement. In this paper, the feasibility of using metal foams to enhance the heat transfer characteristics of heat storage materials in thermal energy storage systems was assessed. Heat transfer in solid/liquid phase change and thermochemical reaction of porous materials (metal foams and expanded graphite) was investigated. Organic commercial paraffin wax and inorganic calcium chloride hydrate were employed as the low-temperature materials, whereas sodium nitrate was used as the high- temperature materials in the experiment. Heat transfer characteristics of these PCMs embedded with open-cell metal foams and expanded graphite were studied. Composites of paraffin and expanded graphite with a graphite mass ratio of 3%, 6%, and 9% were prepared. The heat transfer performances of these composites were tested and compared with the results using metal foams. It is shown that heat transfer can be enhanced by adding these porous materials. Metal foams have better heat transfer performance due to their continuous inter-connected structures than expanded graphite. However, porous materials can suppress the effects of natural convection in liquid zone, particularly for PCMs with low viscosities, thereby leading to different heat transfer performances at different regimes (solid, solid/liquid, and liquid regions). This implies that porous materials do not always enhance heat transfer in every regime; thereby an optimal metal foam structure or expanded graphite fraction can be developed using PCMs for the overal thermal energy storage performance. For thermochemical heat storage systems, the feasibility of using metal foams to enhance the heat transfer capability of heat storage materials was assessed. Reversible reaction MgH2?Mg+H2 was used as thermochemical heat storage reaction. The effective thermal conductivities of metal foams with various porosities (0.88–0.98) were estimated with Boomsma & Poulikakos model. A two dimensional mathematical model for the Mg/MgH2 system was estabilished to study the transient heat and mass transfer process. Heat release characteristics of chemical reaction in fixed beds with/without metal foams were compared to illustrate the effects of metal foams. Various factors influencing the reaction time for fixed reaction beds with metal foams were analyzed. The results show that metal foams shorten the reaction time and increase the output power by decreasing the average temperatures of the fixed beds. After adding metal foams with a porosity of 0.92, a 40% reduction of the reaction time and 60% promotion of the exothermic power can be achieved. The parametric study shows that there exists an optimal porosity of metal foams for the highest output power under a certain reaction condition. The cooling fluid temperature and hydrogen pressure are confirmed to have a more significant impact on the reaction rate when metal foams are embeded in fixed beds. In general, as heat transfer is coupled to phase change and chemical reaction processes in latent heat storage and thermochemical heat storage, the effects of porous materials on these heat storage systems are complex. The porous materials need to be carefully selected in order to optimizing the performance of heat storage systems.


Funded by

国家重点基础研究发展计划(2013CB228303)


References

[1] Sharma A, Tyagi V V, Chen C R, et al. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sust Energy Rev, 2009, 13: 318-345 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Hauer A. Sorption theory for thermal energy storage. In: Paksoy H, ed. Thermal Energy Storage for Sustainable Energy Consumption. Netherlands: Springer. 2007, 234: 393–408. Google Scholar

[3] Pohlmann C, R?ntzsch L, Kalinichenka S, et al. Hydrogen storage properties of compacts of melt-spun Mg90Ni10 flakes and expanded natural graphite. J Alloy Compd, 2011, 509: S625-S628 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Bugaje I M. Enhancing the thermal response of latent heat storage systems. Int J Energy Res, 1997, 21: 759-766 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Koh J C Y, Stevens R L. Enhancement of cooling effectiveness by porous materials in coolant passage. J Heat Trans, 1975, 97: 309-311 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Chow L C, Zhong J K, Beam J E. Thermal conductivity enhancement for phase change storage media. Int Commun Heat Mass, 1996, 23: 91-100 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Fukai J, Hamada Y, Morozumi Y, et al. Effect of carbon-fiber brushes on conductive heat transfer in phase change materials. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2002, 45: 4781-4792 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Fukai J, Hamada Y, Morozumi Y, et al. Improvement of thermal characteristics of latent heat thermal energy storage units using carbon-fiber brushes: Experiments and modeling. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2003, 46: 4513-4525 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Elgafy A, Lafdi K. Effect of carbon nanofiber additives on thermal behavior of phase change materials. Carbon, 2005, 43: 3067-3074 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Hoogendoorn C J, Bart G C J. Performance and modelling of latent heat stores. Sol Energy, 1992, 48: 53-58 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Mauran S, Prades P, L’Haridon F. Heat and mass transfer in consolidated reacting beds for thermochemical systems. Heat Recovery Systems CHP, 1993, 13: 315-319 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Tong X, Khan J A, RuhulAmin M. Enhancement of heat transfer by inserting a metal matrix into a phase change material. Numer Heat Tr A-Appl, 1996, 30: 125-141 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Py X, Olives R, Mauran S. Paraffin/porous-graphite-matrix composite as a high and constant power thermal storage material. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2001, 44: 2727-2737 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Pincemin S, Olives R, Py X, et al. Highly conductive composites made of phase change materials and graphite for thermal storage. Sol Energy Mat Sol C, 2008, 92: 603-613 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Lafdi K, Mesalhy O, Elgafy A. Graphite foams infiltrated with phase change materials as alternative materials for space and terrestrial thermal energy storage applications. Carbon, 2008, 46: 159-168 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Pincemin S, Py X, Olives R, et al. Elaboration of conductive thermal storage composites made of phase change materials and graphite for solar plant. J Sol Energy, 2007, 130: 011005 Google Scholar

[17] Siahpush A, O’Brien J, Crepeau J. Phase change heat transfer enhancement using copper porous foam. J Heat Trans, 2008, 130: 082301 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Chaise A, de Rango P, Marty P, et al. Enhancement of hydrogen sorption in magnesium hydride using expanded natural graphite. Int J Hydrogen Energyy, 2009, 34: 8589-8596 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Mellouli S, Dhaou H, Askri F, et al. Hydrogen storage in metal hydride tanks equipped with metal foam heat exchanger. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 9393-9401 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Laurencelle F, Goyette J. Simulation of heat transfer in a metal hydride reactor with aluminium foam. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32: 2957-2964 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Tsai M L, Yang T S. On the selection of metal foam volume fraction for hydriding time minimization of metal hydride reactors. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 11052-11063 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Bhattacharya A, Calmidi V V, Mahajan R L. Thermophysical properties of high porosity metal foams. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2002, 45: 1017-1031 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Boomsma K, Poulikakos D, Zwick F. Metal foams as compact high performance heat exchangers. Mech Mater, 2003, 35: 1161-1176 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Zhao C Y, Kim T, Lu T J, et al. Thermal transport in high porosity cellular metal foams. J Thermophys Heat Tr, 2004, 18: 309-317 CrossRef Google Scholar

[25] Zhao C Y, Lu T J, Hodson H P. Thermal radiation in ultralight metal foams with open cells. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2004, 47: 2927-2939 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Zhao C Y, Lu T J, Hodson H P. Natural convection in metal foams with open cells. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2005, 48: 2452-2463 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Zhao C Y, Lu T J, Hodson H P, et al. The temperature dependence of effective thermal conductivity of open-celled steel alloy foams. Mater Sci Eng A, 2004, 367: 123-131 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Zhao C Y, Lu W, Tassou S A. Flow boiling heat transfer in horizontal metal-foam tubes. J Heat Trans, 2009, 131: 121002 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Zhao C Y, Tassou S A, Lu T J. Analytical considerations of thermal radiation in cellular metal foams with open cells. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2008, 51: 929-940 CrossRef Google Scholar

[30] Jemni A, Nasrallah S B, Lamloumi J. Experimental and theoretical study of ametal-hydrogen reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 1999, 24: 631-644 CrossRef Google Scholar

[31] Nasrallah S B, Jemni A. Heat and mass transfer models in metal-hydrogen reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 1997, 22: 67-76 CrossRef Google Scholar

[32] Chaise A, Marty P, Rango P, et al. A simple criterion for estimating the effect of pressure gradients during hydrogen absorption in a hydride reactor. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2009, 52: 4564-4572 CrossRef Google Scholar

[33] Chaise A, de Rango P, Marty P, et al. Experimental and numerical study of a magnesium hydride tank. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 6311-6322 CrossRef Google Scholar

[34] Askri F, Jemni A, Ben Nasrallah S. Study of two-dimensional and dynamic heat and mass transfer in a metal–hydrogen reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2003, 28: 537-557 CrossRef Google Scholar

[35] Boomsma K, Poulikakos D. On the effective thermal conductivity of a three-dimensionally structured fluid-saturated metal foam. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 2001, 44: 827-836 CrossRef Google Scholar

[36] Delhomme B, de Rango P, Marty P, et al. Large scale magnesium hydride tank coupled with an external heat source. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 9103-9111 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图1

    实验系统示意图

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图2

    反应器物理模型. (a) 反应器结构简图; (b) 测点在计算域中的分布位置

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图3

    石蜡和六水氯化钙的温度变化. (a) 石蜡; (b) 六水氯化钙

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图4

    相变材料与加热面间温差的变化. (a) 石蜡; (b) 六水氯化钙

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图5

    不同样品中温差Dt3随时间的变化

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图6

    两种情况下反应床的温度变化规律

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图7

    两种情况下系统放热功率的对比

  • Click to view Download high-quality image

    图8

    传热流体温度对反应时间的影响

  • 表1   相变材料的物性参数

    相变材料

    石蜡(RT27)

    六水氯化钙

    硝酸钠

    熔点Tm (℃)

    25~28

    29

    306.8

    热导率 (W m-1 m-1)

    固态: 0.24

    液态: 0.15

    固态: 1.09

    液态: 0.54

    固态: 0.50

    液态: 0.553 (329℃)

    相变潜热 (kJ kg-1)

    179

    190.8

    173.3

    密度r (kg m-3)

    固态: 840

    液态: 750

    固态: 1710

    液态: 1560

    固态: 2261

    液态: 2042

    黏度hs (Pa s)

    0.0190 (50℃)

    0.0225

    0.00264 (液态, 329℃)
  • 表2   金属泡沫的参数

    石蜡(RT27)

    六水氯化钙

    硝酸钠

    材料

    铜

    合金钢

    合金钢

    密度r (kg cm-3)

    0.445

    0.889

    0.445

    孔隙率 (%)

    95

    90

    95

    PPI

    10

    20

    30
  • 表3   反应材料热物性参数

    参数

    设定值

    参数

    设定值

    Ca

    1010 s-1

    Lgas

    0.03 m

    Cd

    10 s-1

    M

    0.002 kg mol-1

    Cps

    1545 J kg-1 K-1

    DS

    -134.9 J K-1 mol-1

    Cpg

    14000 J kg-1 K-1

    V

    1×10-4 m s-1

    Ea

    130 kJ mol-1

    wt

    0.076

    Ed

    41 kJ mol-1

    rg

    0.08189 kg m-3

    DH

    -74.34 kJ mol-1

    rs

    1738 kg m-3

    K

    1.6×10-11

    		 e

    0.5

    Lheat

    0.03 m

    		 m

    8.9×10-6 Pa s

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 科学大众杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1