Instrumented indentation is a method that has been widely used to obtain material properties at micro and nano scale, yet creditable indentation size effect at real nano-scale and its mechanism are still unsolved. This paper summarizes our recent work on progresses in experimental and simulation approaches to this problem. By confirming the crystalline orientations and the surface roughness of the sample, obtaining the tip radius of the indenters, as well as considering tip radius in large-scale molecular simulation, the gap between the experiment and simulation results is bridged, and these two results can be cross verified with each other, which leads to a reliable hardness trend over the indentation depth at nano-scale. Two opposite size effects are observed, and their different mechanisms are revealed, as the conventional size effect results from the plastic behavior such as dislocation nucleation and propagation in the sample beneath the indenter, while the initial reverse size effect is due to the combined effect of the indenter roundness and elastic behavior of the material. Systematic investigation on the efficiency and fidelity of MD and MS is carried out, on problem of the dislocation evolution during indentation, the influence of the relaxation time and convergence resolution on the load curve and dislocation patterns are studied, and suggestion on choice of two simulation methods and the relaxation time and convergence resolution are given.
国家重大科学研究计划(2012CB937500)
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项B类(XDB22000000)
国家自然科学基金(11727803)
感谢北京大学夏蒙棼教授对于相关工作长期以来的支持和指导.
[1] Oliver W C, Pharr G M. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res, 1992, 7: 1564-1583 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[2] Zhang T H, Yang Y M. Development and application of nano-hardness techniques (in Chinese). Adv Mech, 2002, 32: 349?364 [张泰华, 杨业敏. 纳米硬度技术的发展和应用. 力学进展, 2002, 32: 349?364]. Google Scholar
[3] 张泰华. 微/纳米力学测试技术及其应用. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2004. Google Scholar
[4] Jiang P, Zhang T, Feng Y, et al. Determination of plastic properties by instrumented spherical indentation: Expanding cavity model and similarity solution approach. J Mater Res, 2009, 24: 1045-1053 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[5] Yang R, Zhang T, Jiang P, et al. Experimental verification and theoretical analysis of the relationships between hardness, elastic modulus, and the work of indentation. Appl Phys Lett, 2008, 92: 231906 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[6] Yu C, Yang R, Feng Y, et al. Relationships between the work recovery ratio of indentation and plastic parameters for instrumented spherical indentation. MRC, 2015, 5: 89-94 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7] Zhang T, Feng Y, Yang R, et al. A method to determine fracture toughness using cube-corner indentation. Scripta Mater, 2010, 62: 199-201 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8] Peng G, Zhang T, Feng Y, et al. Determination of shear creep compliance of linear viscoelastic solids by instrumented indentation when the contact area has a single maximum. J Mater Res, 2012, 27: 1565-1572 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[9] Lu Z, Feng Y, Peng G, et al. Estimation of surface equi-biaxial residual stress by using instrumented sharp indentation. Mater Sci Eng-A, 2014, 614: 264-272 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10] 张泰华. 微/纳米力学测试技术: 仪器化压入的测量、分析、应用及其标准化. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. 106. Google Scholar
[11] Nix W D, Gao H. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: A law for strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids, 1998, 46: 411-425 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[12] Aifantis E C. Gradient Plasticity. Handbook of Materials Behavior Models. Lemaitre J. Burlington: Academic Press, 2001, 281. Google Scholar
[13] Swadener J G, George E P, Pharr G M. The correlation of the indentation size effect measured with indenters of various shapes. J Mech Phys Solids, 2002, 50: 681-694 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[14] Feng G, Nix W D. Indentation size effect in MgO. Scripta Mater, 2004, 51: 599-603 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15] Elmustafa A A, Stone D S. Nanoindentation and the indentation size effect: Kinetics of deformation and strain gradient plasticity. J Mech Phys Solids, 2003, 51: 357-381 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[16] Gerk A P. The effect of work-hardening upon the hardness of solids: Minimum hardness. J Mater Sci, 1977, 12: 735-738 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[17] Poole W J, Ashby M F, Fleck N A. Micro-hardness of annealed and work-hardened copper polycrystals. Scripta Mater, 1996, 34: 559-564 CrossRef Google Scholar
[18] Yang B, Vehoff H. Dependence of nanohardness upon indentation size and grain size---A local examination of the interaction between dislocations and grain boundaries. Acta Mater, 2007, 55: 849-856 CrossRef Google Scholar
[19] Chuah H G, Ripin Z M. Quantifying the surface roughness effect in microindentation using a proportional specimen resistance model. J Mater Sci, 2013, 48: 6293-6306 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[20] Xia Y, Bigerelle M, Marteau J, et al. Effect of surface roughness in the determination of the mechanical properties of material using nanoindentation test. Scanning, 2014, 36: 134-149 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
[21] Bhushan B, Nosonovsky M. Comprehensive model for scale effects in friction due to adhesion and two- and three-body deformation (plowing). Acta Mater, 2004, 52: 2461-2474 CrossRef Google Scholar
[22] Jang J, Lance M J, Wen S, et al. Indentation-induced phase transformations in silicon: Influences of load, rate and indenter angle on the transformation behavior. Acta Mater, 2005, 53: 1759-1770 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23] Noreyan A, Amar J G, Marinescu I. Molecular dynamics simulations of nanoindentation of -SiC with diamond indenter. Mater Sci Eng-B, 2005, 117: 235-240 CrossRef Google Scholar
[24] Liu Y, Ngan A H W. Depth dependence of hardness in copper single crystals measured by nanoindentation. Scripta Mater, 2001, 44: 237-241 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25] Yang R, Zhang Q, Xiao P, et al. Two opposite size effects of hardness at real nano-scale and their distinct origins. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 16053 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar
[26] Shuang F, Xiao P, Ke F, et al. Efficiency and fidelity of molecular simulations relevant to dislocation evolutions. Comput Mater Sci, 2017, 139: 266-272 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27] Tabor D. The Hardness of Metals. London: Oxford University Press, 1951. Google Scholar
[28] Cheng Y T, Cheng C M. Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements. Mater Sci Eng-R-Rep, 2004, 44: 91-149 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29] Cheng Y T, Cheng C M. Scaling approach to conical indentation in elastic-plastic solids with work hardening. J Appl Phys, 1998, 84: 1284-1291 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[30] Cheng C M, Cheng Y T. On the initial unloading slope in indentation of elastic-plastic solids by an indenter with an axisymmetric smooth profile. Appl Phys Lett, 1997, 71: 2623-2625 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
[31] Feng Y, Zhang T, Yang R. A work approach to determine vickers indentation fracture toughness. J Am Ceramic Soc, 2011, 94: 332-335 CrossRef Google Scholar
[32] Huan Y, Liu D, Yang R, et al. Analysis of the practical force accuracy of electromagnet-based nanoindenters. Measurement, 2010, 43: 1090-1093 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33] Johnson K L. Contact Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Google Scholar
[34] Sneddon I N. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci, 1965, 3: 47-57 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35] Yang R, Zhang T, Feng Y. Theoretical analysis of the relationships between hardness, elastic modulus, and the work of indentation for work-hardening materials. J Mater Res, 2010, 25: 2072-2077 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar
Figure 1
Illustration of indentation parameters with conical indenter.
Figure 2
Comparison between numerical and experimental results of hardness in single crystal Cu, based on available literatures.
Figure 3
(Color online) Specimen specifications. (a) EBSD map for the surface orientation of (100), (110) and (111), no apparent grains and grain boundaries are observed; (b) misorientation profiles of the surface to the presumed orientations, the misorientations are within 1.5°; (c) surface morphology of specimens, scan size of
Figure 4
(Color online) Experiment and simulation results of indentation on Cu. (a) Hardness curves of the Cu samples. The hardness goes up then goes down as the indentation depth deceases, the transition occurs in the range of
Figure 5
(Color online) (a) Indentation force and (b) accumulated times of force evaluation versus indentation depth obtained in MD and MS simulations. (c) Dislocation distribution obtained in MD and MS simulations at the last loading step.
Figure 6
The regimes when attractive and adhesive force between the sample and the indenter influence the simulation results, and the definition of zero point for force and depth.
Figure 7
(Color online) (a) Experiment and simulation results of hardness of Cu in this paper, along with results from available literatures. (b) Hardness peak value over the tip radius. The results from experiment (black square dots), simulation (black round circles) and analytical (red round dot) seem follow the same trend, a power-law fitting curve (red dotted-line) to the data is plotted in the figure. The simulation and experiment results overlap at
晶向 | |||
(1 0 0) | 0.170 | 0.216 | 1.98 |
(1 1 0) | 0.201 | 0.256 | 2.10 |
(1 1 1) | 0.261 | 0.348 | 3.19 |
Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 科学大众杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有
京ICP备18024590号-1