Improvement of the chirality near avoided resonance crossing in optical microcavity

logo

SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, Volume 58, Issue 11: 114210(2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-015-5729-9

Improvement of the chirality near avoided resonance crossing in optical microcavity

More info
  • ReceivedJul 1, 2015
  • AcceptedAug 12, 2015
  • PublishedSep 25, 2015
PACS numbers

Abstract

Chirality is one of the important phenomena at the vicinity of exceptional point (EP). The conventional understanding is that the chirality is determined by asymmetrical scattering efficiency (h), which reaches to zero only when the resonance approaches EP. Here we study the possibility to enhance the chirality in open systems with a more robust mechanism. By combining chirality with avoided resonance crossing, we show that the chirality and h can be dramatically modified. Taking a spiral shaped annular cavity as an example, we show that the chirality of optical resonances can be significantly improved when two sets of chiral states approach each other. The imbalance between counterclockwise (CCW) components and clockwise (CW) components has been enhanced by more than an order of magnitude. Our research provides a new route to tailor and control the chirality in open systems.


Funded by

Shenzhen Fundamental Researches . The author would like to thank Prof. WIERSIG Jan and Prof. CAO Hui for helpful questions and comments(JCYJ20130329155148184)

Shenzhen Peacock Plan(KQCX2012080709143322)

Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University(NCET-11-0809)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(11204055)


References

[1] Kato T. Perturbation Theory of Linear Operators. Berlin: Springer. 1966, Google Scholar

[2] Dembowski C, Gr?f H D, Harney H L, et al. Experimental observation of the topological structure of exceptional points. Phys Rev Lett, 2001, 86: 787-790 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Heiss W D, Harney H L. The chirality of exceptional points. Eur Phys J D, 2001, 17: 149-151 CrossRef Google Scholar

[4] Dembowski C, Gr?f H D, Harney H L, et al. Observation of a chiral state in a microwave cavity. Phys Rev Lett, 2003, 90: 034101 CrossRef Google Scholar

[5] Wiersig J, Kim S W, Hentschel M. Asymmetric scattering and nonorthogonal mode patterns in optical microspirals. Phys Rev A, 2008, 78: 053809 CrossRef Google Scholar

[6] Wiersig J, Ebersp?cher A, Shim J B, et al. Nonorthogonal pairs of copropagating optical modes in deformed microdisk cavities. Phys Rev A, 2011, 84: 023845 CrossRef Google Scholar

[7] Wiersig J. Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: Application to microcavity sensors for single-particle detection. Phys Rev Lett, 2014, 112: 203901 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Chern G D, Türeci H E, Stone A D, et al. Unidirectional lasing from InGaN multiple-quantum-well spiral-shaped micropillars. Appl Phys Lett, 2003, 83: 1710-1712 CrossRef Google Scholar

[9] Redding B, Ge L, Song Q H, et al. Local chirality of optical resonances in ultrasmall resonators. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 108: 253902 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Wiersig J. Chiral and nonorthogonal eigenstate pairs in open quantum systems with weak backscattering between counterpropagating traveling waves. Phys Rev A, 2014, 89: 012119 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Heiss W D. Repulsion of resonance states and exceptional points. Phys Rev E, 2000, 61: 929-932 CrossRef Google Scholar

[12] Wiersig J. Formation of long-lived, scarlike modes near avoided resonance crossings in optical microcavities. Phys Rev Lett, 2006, 97: 253901 CrossRef Google Scholar

[13] Lee S B, Yang J, Moon S, et al. Observation of an exceptional point in a chaotic optical microcavity. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 103: 134101 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Song Q H, Cao H. Improving optical confinement in nanostructures via external mode coupling. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 105: 053902 CrossRef Google Scholar

[15] Wiersig J. Hentschel M. Unidirectional light emission from high-Q modes in optical microcavities. Phys Rev A, 2006, 73: 031802 CrossRef Google Scholar

[16] Song Q H, Ge L, Stone A D, et al. Directional laser emission from a wavelength-scale chaotic microcavity. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 105: 103902 CrossRef Google Scholar

[17] Armani D K, Kippenberg T J, Spillane S M, et al. Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip. Nature, 2003, 421: 925-928 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] N?ckel J U, Stone A D. Ray and wave chaos in asymmetric resonant cavities. Nature, 1997, 385: 45-47 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Gmachl C, Capasso F, Narimanov E E, et al. High-power directional emission from microlasers with chaotic resonators. Science, 1998, 280: 1556 CrossRef Google Scholar

[20] Wang Q J, Yan C L, Yu N F, et al. Whispering-gallery mode resonators for highly unidirectional laser action. Proc Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 22407-22412 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Podolskiy V A, Narimanov E E. Near-sighted superlens. Opt Lett, 2005, 30: 75-77 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Shinohara S, Harayama T, Fukushima T, et al. Chaos-assisted directional light emission from microcavity lasers. Phys Rev Lett, 2010, 104: 163902 CrossRef Google Scholar

[23] Song Q H, Zeng C, Xiao S M. Coherent destruction of dynamical tunneling in asymmetric resonant cavities. Phys Rev A, 2013, 87: 013831 CrossRef Google Scholar

[24] Wang G Z, Zhao M M, Ma J Y, et al. Radiation-pressure-driven mechanical oscillations in silica microdisk resonators on chip. Sci China-Phys Mech Astron, 2015, 58: 050307 Google Scholar

[25] Little B E, Chu S T. Estimating surface-roughness loss and output coupling in microdisk resonators. Opt Lett, 1996, 21: 1390-1392 CrossRef Google Scholar

[26] Khan M H, Shen H, Xuan Y, et al. Ultrabroad-bandwidth arbitrary radiofrequency waveform generation with a silicon photonic chip-based spectral shaper. Nat Photon, 2010, 4: 117-122 CrossRef Google Scholar

[27] Redding B, Ge L, Solomon G S, et al. Directional waveguide coupling from a wavelength-scale deformed microdisk laser. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 100: 061125 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Kim M, Kwon K, Shim J, et al. Partially directional microdisk laser with two Rayleigh scatterers. Opt Lett, 2014, 39: 2423-2426 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Song Q H, Ge L, Redding B, et al. Channeling chaotic rays into waveguides for efficient collection of microcavity emission. Phys Rev Lett, 2012, 108: 243902 CrossRef Google Scholar

[30] Song Q H, Gu Z Y, Liu S, et al. Coherent destruction of tunneling in chaotic microcavities via three-state anti-crossings. Sci Rep, 2014, 4: 4858 Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) Real (a) and imaginary (b) parts of eigenenergies Ei as a function of D. Here E1=D-0.05i, E2=-0.005i, h1=0.1, h2=0.2, and W1 ?W2=0.000275 ?0.00005i . (c) The dependence of asymmetrical scattering parameter hon D.

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) (a) A schematic picture of the spiral-shaped annular cavity. The outer boundary is a circle with r = R and the inner boundary is defined as ρ=r0+εR× (? 2π ?1 ). (b) The resonances in an annular cavity with r0 = 0.56R, and e = 0.15. (c) The field patterns of (|Hz|) of modes 1–3 marked in Figure 2(b).

  • Figure 3

    (Color online) The field distribution (|Hz|) along the outer cavity boundary of the inner-spiral cavity (a) and a circular cavity (b). Here the resonance has normalized frequency around kR=4.3456 and the Azimuthal number m=10.

  • Figure 4

    (Color online) (a) Normalized angular momentum distribution |am| of modes at kR = 4.3455-i0.00056. (b) The chirality a(squares) and K (dots) as a function of kR. The dashed line corresponds to K=1. For clear view, only the longer wavelength mode of every nearly degenerate pair is selected. The other mode of the degenerate pairs shows similar trends in botha and K. HereK= 1 | αm2 |/ ? ?1 | αm2 | corresponds to the imbalance between CCW and CW components.

  • Figure 5

    (Color online) The frequencies (a), Q factors (b), and K factors (c) of HQM with m=10, l=1 and LQM with m=6, l=2 as a function of e. The other parameters are the same as Figure 2. (d) The field patterns of modes i–vi in Figure 5(b).

  • Figure 6

    (Color online) (a) The dependence of K factor on the shape deformation at n=3.3 (dots) and n=3.25 (open squares). Here r0 = 0.7R, w = 0.08R, and d = 0.055R. Unlike Figure 5(c), an additional sharp peak caused by EP can also be found. De and De2 are defined as the width of K enhancement. (b) The position and peak value of the sharp peak as a function of d. Here we set r0 = 0.7R and w=0.08R. (c) The far field pattern of the waveguide coupled spiral shaped annular disk at kR~12.5. Here r0 = 0.7R, e=0.1166, w = 0.08R, and d = 0.045R. The schematic picture with field distribution is shown as the inset. (d) The dependence of unidirectional emission U (squares) and K (dots) on the shape deformation.

  • Figure 7

    (Color online) (a) The schematic picture of the annular ring with a spiral shaped inner boundary. (b), (c) The normalized resonant frequencies and Q factors as a function of later shift d. (d) The chirality of the high Q modes.

  • Figure 8

    (Color online) The field patterns of modes marked as 1–6 in Figure 7(b). Clear mixing in field patterns can be found in modes 3 and 4, where the mode crossing happens.

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 科学大众杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1