Gravitational wave astronomy: chance and challenge to fundamental physics and astrophysics

logo

SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, Volume 59, Issue 11: 110431(2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-016-0324-y

Gravitational wave astronomy: chance and challenge to fundamental physics and astrophysics

More info
  • ReceivedAug 17, 2016
  • AcceptedAug 19, 2016
  • PublishedSep 21, 2016

Abstract

There is no abstract available for this article.


References

[1] Abbott B., et al. ((LIGO Sci Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration)). Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, 116: 061102 CrossRef Google Scholar

[2] Abbott B., et al. ((LIGO Sci Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration)). Phys. Rev. Lett., 2016, 116: 241103 CrossRef Google Scholar

[3] Blair D., Ju L., Zhu Z. H.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2015, 58: 120401 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[4] Blair D., Ju L., Zhao C. N., Wen L. Q., Chu Q., Fang Q., Cai R. G., Gao J. R., Lin X. C., Liu D., Wu L. A., Zhu Z. H., Reitze D. H., Arai K., Zhang F., Flaminio R., Zhu X. J., Hobbs G., Manchester R. N., Shannon R. M., Baccigalupi C., Gao W., Xu P., Bian X., Cao Z. J., Chang Z. J., Dong P., Gong X. F., Huang S. L., Ju P., Luo Z. R., Qiang L. E., Tang W. L., Wan X. Y., Wang Y., Xu S. N., Zang Y. L., Zhang H. P., Lau Y. K., Ni W. T.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2015, 58: 120402 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[5] Mitrofanov V. P., Chao S., Pan H. W., Kuo L. C., Cole G., Degallaix J., Willke B.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2015, 58: 120404 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[6] Blair D., Ju L., Zhao C. N., Wen L. Q., Miao H. X., Cai R. G., Gao J. R., Lin X. C., Liu D., Wu L. A., Zhu Z. H., Hammond G., Paik H. J., Fafone V., Rocchi A., Blair C., Ma Y. Q., Qin J. Y., Page M.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2015, 58: 120405 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[7] Cai R. G., Cao Z. J., Han W. B.. Sci. Bull., 2016, 61: 1525 Google Scholar

[8] Z. J. Cao, Z. H. Du, C. Y. Lin, and H. J. Yo, Sci. Sin.-Phys. Mech. Astron. in press (2016). Google Scholar

[9] Lee H. M., Le Bigot E. O., Du Z. H., Lin Z. X., Guo X. Y., Wen L. Q., Phukon K. S., Pandey V., Bose S., Fan X. L., Hendry M.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2015, 58: 120403 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[10] Chang Z., Huang C. G., Zhao Z. C.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2016, 59: 100421 CrossRef Google Scholar

[11] Pretorius F.. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2005, 95: 121101 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[12] Cao Z., Galaviz P., Li L. F.. Phys. Rev. D, 2013, 87: 104029 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[13] Huang C. G., Li Y. G., Zhu N.. Chin. Phys. Lett., 2016, 33: 080402 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[14] Gao H., Ding X., Wu X. F., Dai Z. G., Zhang B.. ApJ, 2015, 807: 163 CrossRef ADS arXiv Google Scholar

[15] Fan X. L.. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron., 2016, 59: 640001 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    (Color online) Detected data of LIGO after whiten and band pass treatment. The top row and the bottom row correspond to GW150914 and GW151226 respectively. L and H mean the Livingston detector and the Hanford detector respectively.

  • Figure 2

    (Color online) Matched SNR for GW151226 (From Abbott et al. [2]). The top row and the bottom row correspond to the Hanford detector and the Livingston detector respectively. The matched SNR for Hanford and Livingston respectively is about 11 and 8, which leads to the total SNR 112+82 13 [9].

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 科学大众杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1