Surface etching induced ultrathin sandwich structure realizing enhanced photocatalytic activity

logo

SCIENCE CHINA Chemistry, Volume 61, Issue 12: 1572-1580(2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-018-9314-4

Surface etching induced ultrathin sandwich structure realizing enhanced photocatalytic activity

More info
  • ReceivedMay 10, 2018
  • AcceptedJun 20, 2018
  • PublishedSep 21, 2018

Abstract

Photocatalytic conversion efficiency is limited by serious charge carrier recombination. Efficient carrier separation is usually achieved by elegantly-designed multi-component structures connected by directional electric field. Herein, we developed a two-dimensional (2D) sandwich structure, as a new photocatalytic system, to realize high-efficiency carrier separation. This strategy integrated multifunction into a single structure for the first time, which successfully introduces a stable built-in electric field, realizing high-effective carrier separation. Besides, the carrier concentration is dramatically increased due to dimensional confinement. Benefiting from above synergic advantages, 2D sandwich photocatalyst achieves the highest nitrogen fixation rate (435?μmol?g?1?h?1) in inorganic solid photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. We anticipate that 2D sandwich photocatalyst holds promises for the application and expansion of 2D materials in photocatalysis research.


Funded by

the National Basic Research Program of China(2015CB932302)

the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1432133,11321503,21701164)

the National Young Top-Notch Talent Support Program

the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDB01020300)

the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation(141042)

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(WK2060190027,WK2060190058)


Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB932302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1432133, 11321503, 21701164), the National Young Top-Notch Talent Support Program, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB01020300), the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation (141042), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2060190027, WK2060190058). We would like to thank beamline BL14W1 (Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility) and the Catalysis and Surface Science Endstation (National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory) for providing the beam time.


Interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


Contributions statement

These authors contributed equally to this work.


Supplement

Supporting Information

The supporting information is available online at http://chem.scichina.com and http://link.springer.com/journal/11426. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.


References

[1] Chen X, Shen S, Guo L, Mao SS. Chem Rev, 2010, 110: 6503-6570 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[2] Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Mari?as BJ, Mayes AM. Nature, 2008, 452: 301-310 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[3] Perutz RN, Procacci B. Chem Rev, 2016, 116: 8506-8544 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[4] Crabtree RH. Chem Rev, 2015, 115: 127-150 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[5] Tian J, Zhao Z, Kumar A, Boughton RI, Liu H. Chem Soc Rev, 2014, 43: 6920-6937 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[6] Bian Z, Tachikawa T, Zhang P, Fujitsuka M, Majima T. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 136: 458-465 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[7] Maeda K, Ohno T, Domen K. Chem Sci, 2011, 2: 1362-1368 CrossRef Google Scholar

[8] Xie G, Zhang K, Guo B, Liu Q, Fang L, Gong JR. Adv Mater, 2013, 25: 3820-3839 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[9] Zhao C, Luo H, Chen F, Zhang P, Yi L, You K. Energy Environ Sci, 2014, 7: 1700-1707 CrossRef Google Scholar

[10] Tan C, Zhang H. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 12162-12174 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[11] Deng D, Novoselov KS, Fu Q, Zheng N, Tian Z, Bao X. Nat Nanotech, 2016, 11: 218-230 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[12] Bi W, Li X, Zhang L, Jin T, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Luo Y, Wu C, Xie Y. Nat Commun, 2015, 6: 8647 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[13] Huang J, Shang Q, Huang Y, Tang F, Zhang Q, Liu Q, Jiang S, Hu F, Liu W, Luo Y, Yao T, Jiang Y, Pan Z, Sun Z, Wei S. Angew Chem, 2016, 128: 2177-2181 CrossRef Google Scholar

[14] Guan M, Xiao C, Zhang J, Fan S, An R, Cheng Q, Xie J, Zhou M, Ye B, Xie Y. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135: 10411-10417 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[15] Wu W, Wang L, Li Y, Zhang F, Lin L, Niu S, Chenet D, Zhang X, Hao Y, Heinz TF, Hone J, Wang ZL. Nature, 2014, 514: 470-474 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[16] Li H, Shang J, Ai Z, Zhang L. J Am Chem Soc, 2015, 137: 6393-6399 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[17] Ketterer J, Kr?mer V. Acta Crystlogr C Cryst Struct Commun, 1986, 42: 1098-1099 CrossRef Google Scholar

[18] Wu D, Ye L, Yue S, Wang B, Wang W, Yip HY, Wong PK. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120: 7715-7727 CrossRef Google Scholar

[19] Yakovlev VV, Scarel G, Aita CR, Mochizuki S. Appl Phys Lett, 2000, 76: 1107-1109 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[20] Zhang D, Li J, Wang Q, Wu Q. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 8622-8629 CrossRef Google Scholar

[21] Gondal MA, Saleh TA, Drmosh Q. Sci Adv Mater, 2012, 4: 507-510 CrossRef Google Scholar

[22] Denisov VN, Ivlev AN, Lipin AS, Mavrin BN, Orlov VG. J Phys-Condens Matter, 1997, 9: 4967-4978 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[23] Schalow T, Brandt B, Laurin M, Schauermann S, Guimond S, Kuhlenbeck H, Libuda J, Freund HJ. Surf Sci, 2006, 600: 2528-2542 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[24] Electron Inelastic-mean-free-paths N. NIST Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2000. Google Scholar

[25] Li H, Wang D, Wang P, Fan H, Xie T. Chem Eur J, 2009, 15: 12521-12527 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[26] Ye L, Deng K, Xu F, Tian L, Peng T, Zan L. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2012, 14: 82-85 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[27] Kong XY, Lee WPC, Ong WJ, Chai SP, Mohamed AR. ChemCatChem, 2016, 8: 3074-3081 CrossRef Google Scholar

[28] Sun S, An Q, Wang W, Zhang L, Liu J, Goddard III WA. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 201-209 CrossRef Google Scholar

[29] Chen X, Liu L, Yu PY, Mao SS. Science, 2011, 331: 746-750 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[30] Chen J, Guan M, Cai W, Guo J, Xiao C, Zhang G. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2014, 16: 20909-20914 CrossRef PubMed ADS Google Scholar

[31] Kronik L, Shapira Y. Surf Sci Rep, 1999, 37: 1-206 CrossRef ADS Google Scholar

[32] Sun Y, Cheng H, Gao S, Sun Z, Liu Q, Liu Q, Lei F, Yao T, He J, Wei S, Xie Y. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51: 8727-8731 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[33] Bai S, Yang L, Wang C, Lin Y, Lu J, Jiang J, Xiong Y. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2015, 54: 14810-14814 CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar

[34] Sun S, Li X, Wang W, Zhang L, Sun X. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2017, 200: 323-329 CrossRef Google Scholar

  • Figure 1

    Characterizations for the pristine and etching BiOBr nanosheet. (a) XRD pattern. (b) Raman spectra. (c, d) Top and side view of HR-TEM image for pristine sample. (e, f) Top and side view of HR-TEM image for sandwiched sample, there is a very thin layer observed on the surface of the nanosheets after irradiation (color online).

  • Scheme 1

    (a) Sandwich structure of two-dimensional (2D) photocatalyst. (b) The preparation process of the sandwich structure of two-dimensional photocatalyst using the facile surface etching technique. Photo-assisted surface etching with partial Br ion removal, leads to the formation of the structure of surface Bi-O layer (color online).

  • Figure 2

    High-resolution synchrotron radiation photoelectron spectroscopy (HR-SRPES) spectra of sandwiched samples. (a) Br 3d, (b) Bi 4f. High-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (HR-XPS) spectra. (c) Br 3d, (d) Bi 4f (color online).

  • Figure 3

    Extended X-ray absorption fine spectroscopy. (a) The Bi L2-edge extended EXAFS oscillation, and (b) corresponding Fourier transform (FT) for the pristine and sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet (color online).

  • Figure 4

    Photo and electrical properties for the pristine and sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra (inset is the plots of (α)1/2 vs. the photon energy ()). (b) Valence-band spectra measured by SRPES. (c) Schematic illustration of the band structure. (d) The charge density difference for sandwiched BiOBr. The yellow and blue isosurfaces represent charge accumulation and depletion in the space, respectively (color online).

  • Figure 5

    Charge transport properties for the pristine and sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet. (a) Room-temperature steady-state PL spectra. (b) Time-resolved PL spectra for the pristine and sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet. (c) Surface photovoltage spectra. (d) EIS Nyquist plots. (e) Mott-Schottky plots. (f) Transient OCVD measurements after exposure to visible light irradiation. (g) Average lifetimes of the photogenerated carriers (τn) obtained from the OCVD measurements (color online).

  • Figure 6

    (a) Photocatalytic N2 reduction performance comparisons for the pristine and sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet. (b) Comparison of visible light nitrogen fixation rate for the pristine and sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet. (c) Comparison of NH3 and O2 yield on sandwiched BiOBr. (d) Multicycle N2 fixation with sandwiched BiOBr nanosheet (color online).

Copyright 2019 Science China Press Co., Ltd. 科学大众杂志社有限责任公司 版权所有

京ICP备18024590号-1